The "January 7 Memo" is no longer just a rumor; it is an operational reality. While the White House has announced a withdrawal from 66 international organizations in total, the most devastating blow is the surgical removal of U.S. support from 31 specific United Nations entities.
This isn't just a budget cut. It is a fundamental redesign of the global order. By staying in the UN Security Council while gutting these 31 agencies, the U.S. is signaling a shift toward a "Hard Power Only" doctrine—protecting its veto while walking away from the "soft" work of global health, climate science, and regional diplomacy.
Here is the breakdown of the agencies hit hardest and what is disappearing on the ground.
1. The "Ideological" Front: Climate and Gender
The most high-profile targets in the memo are the agencies the administration has labeled "woke" or "contrary to national sovereignty."
UNFPA (UN Population Fund): The U.S. was historically the leading donor.
The Ground Reality: Internal UN reports suggest that 10 to 12 million women and girls will lose access to essential health services in 2026. In places like Afghanistan and Yemen, where the UNFPA is the only provider of maternal care, clinics are expected to start shuttering within 60 days.
UN Women: By exiting the UN Entity for Gender Equality, the U.S. removes itself from the primary body monitoring gender-based violence in conflict zones.
UNFCCC & IPCC: The U.S. didn’t just leave the Paris Agreement; it left the treaty itself. This is the "nuclear option" of climate diplomacy. The U.S. will no longer participate in climate negotiations or fund the scientists (IPCC) who track global warming, effectively "blinding" the world's most sophisticated data-gathering machine.
2. The "Strategic" Front: Regional Commissions
Perhaps the most under-reported part of the 31-agency exit is the withdrawal from four out of five UN Regional Commissions:
ECA (Africa)
ECLAC (Latin America)
ESCAP (Asia-Pacific)
ESCWA (Western Asia)
Why this matters: These commissions are the "engine rooms" of regional trade and development. By leaving them, the U.S. has effectively handed the keys to China and the BRICS+ alliance. If you want to know who will set the trade standards for the next generation of African infrastructure or South American lithium mines, it will no longer be an organization with a U.S. seat at the table.
3. The "Technical" Front: Global Standards
The memo also targets the "plumbing" of the global system—agencies that keep the world running in the background.
UN Water, UN Oceans, and UN Energy: These entities coordinate cross-border resource management. Without U.S. participation, maritime law and international energy grid standards enter a period of "normative chaos."
UN-Habitat: The U.S. withdrawal from the human settlements program ends American influence on how rapidly growing megacities in the Global South are designed and governed.
4. The "Peacebuilding" Vacuum
The U.S. is exiting the Peacebuilding Commission and the Peacebuilding Fund. While the U.S. is still funding direct humanitarian aid (see below), it is no longer funding the prevention of war. The Peacebuilding Fund is the "firewall" that keeps ethnic tensions from becoming full-scale civil wars. Without the U.S., this fund loses nearly 25% of its capacity, making the next "surprise" conflict much harder to stop.
The Paradox: What the U.S. Kept
To understand the "America First" strategy, you have to look at what was not on the list. The U.S. is maintaining its role in:
The UN Security Council: To maintain the veto.
The World Food Programme (WFP): To control global food security.
UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR): To manage migration flows at the source.
The "Security Check": Alongside the withdrawal memo, the administration announced a $2 billion humanitarian "surge" through the UN’s emergency office (OCHA).
The takeaway? The U.S. is willing to pay for the consequences of global instability (famine and refugees) while refusing to pay for the institutions that try to prevent those problems through diplomacy, climate science, or human rights.
Final Thoughts
The "31" represent the connective tissue of the 20th-century global order. By dissolving that tissue, the U.S. is betting that it can manage the world through direct deals and raw military/economic power.
For the 10 million women losing healthcare and the climate scientists losing their funding, the 21st century just became a much lonelier place.
No comments:
Post a Comment