In the span of just 48 hours this week, two separate juries in two different US states delivered verdicts that could reshape the entire social media industry — not because of the dollar amounts involved, but because of what those verdicts legally establish for the first time. On Tuesday, March 24, a jury in Santa Fe, New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375 million for failing to protect children from sexual exploitation on Facebook and Instagram. Less than 24 hours later, on Wednesday, March 25, a jury in Los Angeles found both Meta and Google (YouTube) liable for engineering addiction in young users — finding them negligent in the design of their platforms and awarding a further $6 million in damages. Two days. Two states. Two juries. Both pointing at the same conclusion: that Big Tech can no longer hide behind the legal shields it has relied on for nearly three decades. This is the story of what happened, why it matters far beyond the headline numbers, and what comes next for the s...
Microsoft has admitted that it has indeed lifted code of micro blogging site plurk. Microsoft on it's blog has said The vendor has now acknowledged that a portion of the code they provided was indeed copied. This was in clear violation of the vendor’s contract with the MSN China joint venture, and equally inconsistent with Microsoft’s policies respecting intellectual property. putting the blame squarely on the vendor and has said that they have suspended the service called Juku indefinitely They also said when then when Plurk blogged about the code lift it was the middle of the night in China and had to wait till the morning before their employees could come and do something about it. The whole incident has left them reeling from embarrassment. when one of the largest companies in the world can allow such things to happen in the first place. No matter whatever the outcome this is the good for Plurk what, with all the publicity. An original post by Sociolatte